THE AFRICAN HAS A HISTORY, TREVOR ROPER
Generations of traders came by ship or caravan, to purchase Africa’s wealth in gold, ivory and human beings, but
their report produced more mysteries than they sold. Where did Africans come
from? Why did they look so different from other men, and have different
customs? Eventually the Europeans concluded that the Africans were savages,
inferior human beings, and they could not help being the way they are. According
to Chapter one of History of Africa
named; The Original Africans, that answer lasted until the African nations
regained their independence in the middle of the twentieth century. Since that
time scholars have rediscovered Africa’s
history and heritage. The so called “dark continent”, it turns out, is not just
a land of endless savagery and chaos. Its people have a history of their own,
and have created cultures, nations and art that often compare favourably to
what other cultures have produced.
(http://xenohistorian.faithweb.com/africa/af01.html)
For a long time, all kinds of myths and prejudice concealed
the true history of Africa from the world at
large (Ki-Zerbo (Ed.) 1995). Although pioneers like Leo Frobenius, Maurice
Delafosse and Arturo Labriola have done important work on Africa
as early as the first decades of this century; a great many non-African experts
could not rid themselves of certain preconceptions and argued that the lack of
written sources and documents made it impossible to engage in any scientific
study of such societies. But the question is: is history all about paper or
written documents? “Before even the British came into relations with our
people, we were a developed people, having our own institutions, having our own
ideas of governance.” (J. E. Casely-Hayford, 1992) the continent of African had
been occupied by black Africans, several million years ago. This is to say
that, long before the white man came to Africa,
the African continent has been occupied by Black African and had their
independence. According to Walter Rodney (1973) in his book “How Europe Underdeveloped Africa; there
were developments going on in Africa until the
white man came and it was truncated. All these and many other reasons refute
the assertion by Trevor Roper that Africa has
no history.
Hugh Trevor-Roper, the son of a doctor, was born in
Northumberland on the 15th January, 1914 and died on 26th
January, 2003 of cancer in an oxford hospital. He was 89years. He was educated
at Charterhouse and Christ Church, Oxford; he
became a research fellow at Morton
College in 1937. He was a
historian who was known for his studies in 17th Century European
history. He was a Regius Professor of Modern History at Oxford University.
In 1963, the Regius Professor of Modern History at the University of Oxford,
Hugh Trevor-Roper(later, Lord Docre of Glanton), gave a series of lectures at
Sussex University that were transmitted by BBC television and, subsequently
published both in a popular periodical and in a book (Fuglasted, 2005). According
to David (2010), the lectures by Trevor-Roper were reprinted in The Listener in
November and December and then with changes in The Rise of Christian Europe in 1965. This is to say that, H. R.
Trevor Roper – in a moment of condescension that quickly became notorious –
declared to an audience on the BBC; “Perhaps in the future, there will be some
African History to teach. But, at present there is none: there is only the
history of the Europeans in Africa. The rest
is darkness… “Trevor-Roper had not then enabled as Lord of Glanton; but if he
spoke without the authority of the peerage, his pronouncement still came, as it
were, ex cathedra, from the podium of the Regius Professor of Modern History at
Oxford (Kwame Anthony Appiah, 1998).
G. W. F. Hegel earlier before Trevor-Roper mentioned that
when it came to humanity and human history, unfortunately, there just was no
room for Africans. Hegel stated; “At this point we leave Africa,
not to mention it again. For it is no historical part of the World: it has no
movement and development to exhibit”. He claimed that the historical movement
and development that is in the northern part belong to the Asiatic or European
World. It is against this back drop that Oxford
university professor Hugh Trevor-Roper echoed Hegel over a century later when
he stated “Perhaps in the future there is only the history of Europeans in Africa. The rest is darkness, and darkness is not the
subject of history.”
Perhaps one may argue that, Trevor-Roper, Hegel and people
who have said that there is no history in Africa
were looking at movement and paper sources. Personally, I believe history go
way beyond the two mentioned above. “The general history of Africa
is, in particular, a history of ideas and civilizations, societies and
institutions. It is based on a wide variety of sources including oral tradition
and art forms” (General History of Africa (1993) edited by Ali A. Mazrui and C.
wondji). According to the Oxford English Dictionary history is the study of
past events; the past. The Cambridge International Dictionary of English also
sees history as something that has been done or experienced by a particular
persons or thing repeatedly over a long period. The word history comes from the
Greek word historia, means “inquiry, knowledge acquired by investigation.
History is the discovery, collection, organization, and presentation of
information about past events. All the above on history tells us the there is
more to history than just written materials and movement. The quotation by
Trevor-Roper has two (2) dimensions: He says the history began when the white
man came and you can clearly see that for Trevor-Roper, if there is no written
material, then there is no history but Africans have based their history on
oral history so Trevor-Roper’s argument does not hold water and leaves much to
be desired because before the white man came to Africa there were a lot of
things going on. He has exhibited a very high level of ignorance in African
issues.
The book, “The Ambiguities
of History: The Problem of Ethnocentrism in Historical Writing, written by
Fin Fuglestad, argues that history may, by definition, be an imperialist
science or a quintessentially Western form of discourse. Finn Fuglestad thinks
there is something profoundly ambiguous about the science or academic
discipline we call history. It is the only science that is the product of its
own object of study, the past, an object outside of which it cannot exist. It
is also the only the science that can study itself. You know, history has a
relationship with one of the so called civilizations of the world that borders
on the incestuous. The civilization is Western Civilization: history has both
emerged from it and helped to shape it in such a way that they are inextricably
linked. History, with its Western conceptual framework, has become a defining
part of Western Civilization to the extent that the West cannot even conceive
of itself being without a history. But what happens when history is removed
from its natural habitat? The real issue therefore concerns all those societies
and people outside the West who, in accordance with the Hegelian tradition,
have traditionally been labeled as “without history”. What does it mean exactly
“not to have history?” The construction of the pasts of “people without” poses
a tremendous challenge to the science of history, especially at the conceptual
level.
Again Fuglestad(1992) in his essay “The Trevor-Roper Trap or the Imperialism of History, asserted that back
in the early 1960’s the distinguished Professor Hugh Trevor-Roper of Oxford University
proclaimed, as every Africanist probably knows, that at least pre-colonial
Black African had no history. He must have meant what he said, for he repeated
his contention in 1969 by putting the label “unhistoric” on the African
continent; the whole of the African continent that is, including Ethiopia, Egypt, and the Maghrib. History
tells us that civilization started way back in Egypt
which is in Africa so what does Trevor-Roper
call that one? Darkness? Africa’s great civilizations
made an immense contribution to the world, which is still marvelled at by
people today. Ancient Egypt,
which first developed over 5000 years ago, is one of the most notable of these civilizations
and one of the first monarchies anywhere in the world. However even before the
rise of this civilization, the earlier monarchy of Ta Seti was founded in Nubia, in what is today the Sudan. Egypt
of the pharaohs is best known for its great monuments and feats of engineering
(such as the Pyramids), but it also made great advances in many other fields
too. The Egyptians produced early forms of paper and a written script. They
developed the calendar too and made important contributions in various branches
of mathematics, such as geometry and algebra, and it seems likely that they
understood and perhaps invented the use of zero. They made important
contributions in mechanics, philosophy, irrigation and architecture. In
medicine, the Egyptians understood the body’s dependence on the brain over 1000
years before the Greek scholar, Democritus. Some historians now believe that
ancient Egypt had an
important influence on ancient Greece,
and they point to the fact that Greek scholars such as Pythagoras and
Archimedes studied in Egypt,
and that the work of Aristotle and Plato was largely based on earlier
scholarship in Egypt.
For example, what is commonly known as Pythagoras’ theorem was known to the
ancient Egyptians hundreds of years before Pythagoras’ birth.
On the face of it there is little reason why we should
bother with this type of point of view now in the 1990s. After all, the
avalanche of articles and books on African history, including several
multi-volume General Histories – which have been published since the 19960s, in
a sense bear testimony to the absurdity of Trevor-Roper’s position. Walter
Rodney (1972) a West Indian Marxist historian from Guyana
is best known for his book
How Europe
Underdeveloped Africa. The book was
published for a number of reasons and one of the reasons for this book’s appeal
is the author’s considerable knowledge of African history and his skill in
using this knowledge to discredit those many European writers of the past who
considered Africans primitive and who echoed the notorious statement of Hugh
Trevor-Roper that, “Africa has no history”. According to Professor Adu Boahen,
Trevor-Roper is a man who had never done any serious research in Africa, but he felt confident enough out of sheer
intellectual ignorance to make that statement. (
www.modernghana.com/news/...)
There has been existence in Africa before the white man came
to Africa and there is no existence without
history. For example during the period that the white man had not come to
Africa, Africa was organized into political,
cultural, social and economic institutions. Earlier in the pro-colonial Africa,
that is before the European came to Africa, Africa
had its own political organization which deals with who should have authority.
There were two (2) types of states systems in Africa
namely the centralized and non-centralized. In the non-centralized system which
is also called ACEPHALOUS authority or power and rights were given to elders,
priests and age grade systems. The centralized system has one person in whose
hands power was vested. It was the powerful kings and high-ranking chiefs like
the rulers of Asante or Oyo (Yuroba)
in West Africa. So with this one, there is a
figure had who has the power to rule. It is evident that there were people in
Africa and this happened in Africa before the Europeans came to Africa to stop Africa’s development.
Again, long before the white man came to Africa;
Africans were organized into small family units, grouped into several units
called clans. The clans were organized by a name, label and can be sued and
they had characteristics like head of clan, council of elders, name and
appellation, owned properties, only to mention a few things here. All these go
a long way to give evidence that there was existence in Africa and so I do not
agree with Trevor-Roper when he says Africa
does not have history.
Some would argue, of course that Trevor-Roper and others are
looking at written documents to show history but is that the only thing which
can store history? Several million years ago before the Europeans came to Africa, the African continent was occupied by Black
Africans and this is evident in Archaeology, Ancient Record, Musicology, Rock
arts, Monuments, Numismatics, Oral history, and so on. For example Archaeology
which is the scientific study of earlier civilization and past human cultures,
gives evidence that there has been existence on the African continent
especially when people excavated parts of Africa and discovered relics. It has
been discovered that far from having no history, it is likely that human
history actually began in Africa. The oldest
evidence of human existence and that of our immediate ancestors has been found
in Africa. In July 2002 further evidence of
the existence of early hominids in Africa was found with the discovery of the
fossilised remains of what has been called Sahelanthropus tchadensis,
thought to be between 6-7 million years old, in Chad. The latest scientific
research points to the fact that all human beings are likely to have African
ancestors. This tells us that there was life in Africa even before the white
man came to Africa and that is history.
Another example is ancient records and documents. Documents
like Tarik Al Fatash, Ibn Bahata and other Arabic scholars and record keepers
deposited in Cairo Universities are all evidence that point to the fact that
people had occupied Africa long ago. There are
documents which are secretly stored in Libya universities which suggest
that there were Trans-Sahara Trade by the early Africans and Arabs is evidence
that there was life by black Africans on the African continent. Musicology
which is the scholarly study of music also gives evidence of existence in Africa before the European came. This is because the
music genre in Africa can be traced to ancient
mediums. The genre of music the Africa has tells us that people lived in Africa. Some of which are played at festivals. Again,
Africans showed their love for art through rock arts by people who lived long
ago. They did not use papers but did art on rocks. The rock paintings in the Basuti Land
in South Africa
and Tassili are evidences. We can also mention the rock art is Egypt
when they used pictures on the wall to tell stories, their imaginations and
dreams. All these and many other things space will not allow me to mention are
evidences that there were people in Africa before the Europeans came to Africa. Africa had a
history and still has history.
Dendrochronology or tree ring dating is the scientific
method of dating based on the analysis of patterns of tree-rings. It can date
the time at which tree rings were formed and even used to look at how old a
society is. Is Trevor- Roper telling us that, those big Nim trees and other
huge trees around are less than 50years? I do not think so. Africa
has a history and it did not start with the Europeans. According to Dr.
Phillippe Denis of the University
of Natal, oral history is
based on hearsay or eye witness accounts about events and situations. “Oral history is as old as history itself. It
was the first kind of history” (Thompson, 1988, p.23). The African had used
oral history as its history so again I do not agree with Trevor-Roper. “Africa had its own history, it had its own cultures, its
had its own nations.” (Basil Davidson as cited in Unscrambling Africa by
Geoffrey Wheatcraft). Davidson once wrote that in the 13th century,
“The scholarship of Timbuktu and Djenne could
probably have given points to that of Oxford and
Cambridge.
It is not true that Africa
has no history. It is evident from the above discussions that Africa
has a history which did not start with the Europeans. Africans and the African
continent have made enormous contributions to human history just as other
peoples and continents have. It is the development of Eurocentric and racist views
in Europe that have denied this fact and sought to negate the history of Africa and its peoples.
DESMOND LAMPTEY
GHANA INSTITUTE OF JOURNALISM & RADIO XYZ 93.1FM
SOURCES
Coventry,
L. and Nixon, M. (Eds.)(1999). Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
David, D. (2010). There
is no African History, The Toynbee Convertor. Retrieved May 20, 2012 from
http://davidderrick.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/there-is-no-african-his...
Encyclopedia (2003). A
History of Africa: The Original Africans.
Retrieved May 16, 2012 from http://xenohistorian.faithweb.com/africa/af01.html
Fuglestad, F. (2005). The
Ambiguities of History: The Problem of Ethnocentrism in Historical Writing.
(8). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Hegel, G. W. F., (1956). The
Philosophy of History, trans. J. Jibree. New York:
Dover
Ki-Zerbo, J. (Ed).(1995). General History of Africa (Vol. 1):
Methodology and African Prehistory. California:
University of California Press
Mazrui, A. A. and Wondji, C. (Ed.)(1993). General History of Africa
(8). California: University of California
Press.
Procter, P. (Ed.)(1894). Cambridge International Dictionary of English.
Thompson, Paul, The
voice of the Past. Oral History, 2nd edition Oxford
and New York:
Oxford University Press, 1988
Trevor-Roper, H. (1964). Rise
of Christian Europe, London: Thames and Hudson
Walter, R. (1973). How
Europe Underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture
Publication. Retrieved May 16, 2012 from
http://www.opuslibros.org/index_libros/Recensiones_1/rodney_euro.htm
Walter, R. (1973). How
Europe Underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture
Publication.
.
